Ciao belle signorine,
Dawn recently got me hooked on online shopping for make-up products.
I've only made two purchases so far, and one of them is the Benefit Erase Paste. I wasn't planning on buying it but I heard Benefit and the price and I said "BUY IT!"
This would be my first high-end concealer. I've recently realized I'd only need a good concealer and powder whenever I'm on the go (which happens almost 3 times in a week), so I've been looking out to try other brands. I've used concealers from Sonia Kashuk, San San, Body Shop and Elf.
REVIEW:
As I would expect of any Benefit product (mostly those I've seen on the net and in Dawn's stuff) the packaging looked so pretty, it made me giggle like an infatuated teenager. :)
A few precautionary advice on the box.
What the product says and instructions.
I forgot to bring the small pamphlet about this one so there are no shots of it... sorry. Maybe I would add that in one my next posts.
Other details of the product.
I like that there's a spatula included and another cover inside. I'm a neat freak in some stuffs so I'm glad that they had these.
Also the spatula would be a great help to ensure that you get every last bit of the product especially those on the sides of the bottle.
This is a pre-loved product by the way and it still had 90% in it. :)
One dip and you get a lot of the product already.
When applied, it goes on quite strong so you really just need a small amount every time you use it. It also feels a little sticky for my liking but it does spread quite well.
I've asked Dawn to use it on her since it's a little whiter than I am and I need powder to even it out.
Here is a before and after, no prior foundation and no primers as well.
As you can see, it's great for under the eyes and conceals well. I find it very useful in covering up spots on my forehead and cheeks as it gives a really good coverage.
I haven't used it for longer than 4 - 5 hours because I have less classes to attend to these days, so I can't comment on whether it lasts longer than that.
If I could, I'd use it as a foundation, but it's too expensive for that purpose and I'd need to be fairer than I am now.
What I like:
1. Packaging is super pretty.
2. Spatula included.
3. It conceals really well.
4. A little of it goes a long way.
5. Instructions included
6. Feels light on skin
What I don't like:
1. Feels sticky when applied.
2. Although it's locally available, the branch (@ Greenbelt 5) is quite far from the house.
3. Hard to find another cheap one. Regular price is quite expensive for me.
Will I buy again?
Of course, if I have the money for the original price.
Or we find a another deal online. :)
I still use the San San and Sonia Kashuk concealers that I have with me and reserve this baby for when I pull all nighters.
So have you tried this before? Any comments on it? Any other concealers you can recommend?
Cheers,
LIZ
Shocks, ang ganda sana. Looks very creamy. Kaso ang mahal.
ReplyDeleteI like that it has parabens. Kapag nasa pot kasi yung makeup, maganda na super lakas ng preservatives.
I'm eye-ing bobby brown or mac for my first real concealer, now I'm using a full coverage cream foundation for my concealer.
@rae - i never bother with the ingredients so thanks for that. :) I learned something. I used to not use any concealers din and use the small liquid foundation samples that my tita gives me as a concealer. Hope you buy one of those and do tell me how they are. :)
ReplyDeleteThis looks interesting; but I'm quite satisfied with my sansan concealer. It's one of the most inexpensive yet effective product I have tried :)
ReplyDelete@gellie - San San concealers are really good finds. :) I prefer them for everyday cause they don't feel sticky and heavy but it's nice to try new stuff from time to time.
ReplyDeleteGreat find! I personally don't have a concealer yet (for personal use). Then again I usually just don't bother with concealer >.> For my under eyes I just use the Garnier BB roll on.
ReplyDeleteI have concealers I do use on clients though.
@chriselle - I haven't seen the Garnier BB roll on is there one in Watson's? I might not have been looking hard enough.
ReplyDelete